You don’t fund the enemy. You weaponize the funding. Most people aren’t ready for that concept.
When the Treasury Department lifted Iranian oil sanctions on Friday night, I was already monitoring the situation. 4:30 AM. Patton had been restless since 3:00, pacing near the television where I track energy markets between sets of pull-ups. The Washington Post reported that the administration “unsanctioned” 140 million barrels of Iranian crude already loaded onto vessels. The word they used was “bewilderment.” The word I’d use is checkmate.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent put it in terms that anyone with a strategic mindset should understand: the United States will use Iranian barrels against Tehran to keep prices down while Operation Epic Fury continues. That’s not desperation. That’s turning the enemy’s own supply lines into a weapon. Sun Tzu wrote about this. I have it highlighted.
Why the Iranian Oil Sanctions Move Is Strategic, Not Weak
The critics are already screaming. Some analyst named Brett Erickson told the Post that this is “the action of an administration that has no exit ramp and knows it.” He called it desperation. With respect—and I use that term loosely—that’s what people who’ve never coordinated high-pressure situations across multiple territories say when they see a maneuver they can’t process. My regional manager says the same thing about Q1 forecasting.
CNN reported the administration has already exhausted its standard options: 172 million barrels from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, sanctions lifted on Russian oil, the Jones Act waived, domestic production orders signed. None moved the needle. Brent crude sits at $112. Gas is approaching four dollars.
The weak see that list and panic. The strong see it and recognize a multi-front economic offensive. Prices haven’t dropped yet? That doesn’t mean the strategy failed. It means the strategy hasn’t finished.
The Real Iranian Oil Sanctions Endgame
Here’s what the timeline of this conflict tells you. We attacked. Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz. Oil prices surged fifty percent. And now, instead of retreating, we’re seizing their own oil revenue stream and redirecting it through global markets that we control. Iran gets less money than it would selling at a discount to China. The world gets more oil. Prices come down. Victory.
At least, that’s the theory Bessent articulated. NPR noted that no amount of lever-pulling can replace fifteen million barrels per day stuck at the Strait. Europe still sanctions Iranian oil. Goldman Sachs projects elevated prices through 2027.
Those are the facts the weak focus on. The context here is strength. You don’t bomb a country, crash the oil market, drain your reserves, unsanction your enemy’s oil, and call it chaos. You call it a five-phase operation where most observers can only see phase two.
Strength Requires Moves You Don’t Explain to Critics
Patton—my German Shepherd, not the general, though the comparison stands—watched the Fox Business segment where Bessent previewed this move. His ears went forward at “break the glass plan.” That dog knows operational language.
A college student asked UN Ambassador Waltz on CNN how a war funded by his taxes was helping him. Waltz talked about housing and tough decisions. Some people look at a complex energy strategy and only see the gas receipt.
Me? I see what’s behind it. Behind this move is a commander-in-chief who funds his enemy’s oil because he’s already three steps past the part where that matters. That’s not a contradiction. That’s operating at a level most people aren’t cleared for.
My phone is ringing. It’s my regional manager again, asking about the Q1 numbers. Not now. Bigger things are happening.
About the Author
